Ah, Jim Sheridan, the guy who’s apparently been traumatized since the womb. ๐ถ According to him, his obsession with defending the falsely accused stems from his mother’s guilt over, like, killing her own mother during childbirth. ๐คฏ Talk about a guilt trip! I mean, seriously, who needs therapy when you can just make movies about it? ๐
This “unwavering obsession” (as they call it) has fueled his career, from *In the Name of the Father* (where Daniel Day-Lewis probably suffered more than the actual falsely accused guy) to his latest masterpiece, *Re-creation*. ๐ฌ It premiered at Tribeca, which is basically where movies go to die a slow, agonizing death. ๐
Sheridan says seeing someone wrongly accused “flips a switch” and he “goes nuts.” ๐คช Yeah, we can tell, Jim. We can tell. Maybe chill out with the melodrama, buddy? ๐ง
*Re-creation* is about the 1996 murder of Sophie Toscan du Plantier. ๐ช It’s a fictionalized courtroom trial because, you know, reality is boring. ๐ด Sheridan already milked this story for a 5-part TV doc, but apparently, he needed to “do justice” to it. Because who needs actual justice when you can have artistic justice? ๐จ
He blends fiction, docudrama, and emotion to “defy genre conventions.” ๐ Translation: he has no idea what he’s doing, but he’s hoping you’re too dumb to notice. ๐ง
“I wanted to show the blur between the lines between documentary, reality, and fiction,” he says. ๐ค So, basically, he wants to confuse you into thinking his movie is deep. ๐ตโ๐ซ
The film addresses the “failures” in the media and legal responses to the murder. Because Sheridan is obviously more qualified than actual investigators and journalists. ๐ต๏ธโโ๏ธ He’s especially concerned about the treatment of Ian Bailey, the “primary suspect” who died still claiming he was innocent. ๐ Sure, Jim, everyone’s innocent. That’s why prisons are empty. ๐คก
Bailey’s story got Netflix-ified in *Sophie: A Murder in West Cork*, which Sheridan thinks “deeply misrepresented the truth.” ๐ Because only Sheridan knows the TRUTH! ๐ฃ๏ธ He hates the true crime genre, calling it sensationalist and driven by vendetta. ๐ก “The entire bloody True Crime genre is now based around *In Cold Blood*,” he whines. ๐ญ Boo-hoo, Jim. Maybe try making a good movie for once? ๐คท
Shot on a “shoestring budget” over three weeks. ๐งต Yeah, we can tell. It probably looks like it was filmed on a potato. ๐ฅ The bulk of *Re-creation* is in a jury room, in homage to *12 Angry Men*. ๐ Because originality is overrated, right? ๐ด He fused it with *Anatomy of a Fall* to reflect skepticism toward the judicial process and the media. ๐ So edgy, Jim. So edgy. ๐ช
Here’s an “exclusive clip” from the film. ๐ Prepare to be underwhelmed. ๐ด
Sheridan plays the jury foreman himself. ๐คฆ Because who needs actors when you have a director with a Messiah complex? ๐ฆธ Vicky Krieps is “the quietly forceful juror number 8,” a “symbolic voice for Sophie.” ๐ Translation: she probably has, like, five lines. ๐ค Colm Meaney is Ian Bailey, but he’s silent. ๐คซ Because that’s not insulting at all. ๐ Aidan Gillen is a defense lawyer, and John Connors is one of the jurors. ๐
Exteriors were filmed in West Cork, interiors in Dublin and Luxembourg. ๐บ๏ธ The script was “heavily improvised.” ๐คช So, basically, they just winged it. ๐ชถ “It was an attempt to cross the line between fiction and fact and to show that those lines have been irretrievably blurred,” Sheridan says. ๐ตโ๐ซ Translation: “I have no idea what I’m doing, but I’m hoping you’ll think I’m a genius.” ๐ง
Thanks to Sheridan’s “dogged efforts,” the murder investigation is now under a cold case review. ๐ฅถ Because Hollywood can solve crimes better than the police. ๐
Sheridan and Merriman hope their film “rekindles public interest” and “spurs legal action.” ๐ “We’re hopeful that this film could start a conversation which will drive people to, you know, do the right thing,” Merriman says. ๐ “To search for justice and find out who actually killed Sophie Toscan du Plantier, rather than just saying, ‘Oh, Ian Bailey did it,’ and that’s good for us, because he’s English, so he’s a villain.” ๐ Because nothing says justice like a good old-fashioned xenophobic conspiracy theory. ๐ฝ
Finn McFrame, celebrated satirical mastermind and self-proclaimed “Emperor of Irony,” started his illustrious career as a cinematographer, where his expertise in capturing every single frame of a squirrel stealing a baguette earned him accolades at obscure film festivals.
Born in the glamorous town of Boring, Oregon, Finn grew up with dreams of being a Hollywood director until he realized that satire, not cinema, was his true callingโor at least the one that let him sleep until noon.
Finn McFrame: changing the world, one satirical lens flare at a time.