Folks, I’m sipping my coffee and reading about the latest drama involving former FBI Director James Comey, and I’ve got to say, it’s a wild ride. Apparently, federal officials tracked Comey’s movements from North Carolina to Virginia after he posted some photos of seashells spelling out “86 47” on social media. Now, I’m no expert, but it seems like a bit of a stretch to think that a bunch of seashells could be a threat to the President. But hey, I guess that’s why I’m not a federal agent. Comey’s attorneys are alleging that the government tracked him without a warrant, which raises some serious questions about privacy and civil liberties.
According to the newly released federal court filings, President Donald Trump was keeping a close eye on the investigation from Air Force One. I mean, who wouldn’t want to know what’s going on with their longtime critic, right? The filings also reveal that investigators interviewed some interesting characters, including Gambino crime family member “Sammy the Bull” Gravano. Because, you know, when you’re trying to build a case against someone, you’ve got to talk to the experts – like a former mobster.
The defense is trying to get the case dismissed, arguing that the photo of the seashells doesn’t represent a true threat and is protected by the First Amendment. It’s hard to disagree with that, considering the whole thing seems like a big misunderstanding. I mean, who posts photos of seashells as a threat? It’s just confusing. The Secret Service even asked agents if they could track Comey’s phone, but one agent said it was a “bad idea” because they would need to declare an exigency exemption. Yeah, that sounds like a real mouthful.
The story gets even more bizarre, with the Secret Service tracking Comey’s phone as he and his wife drove north on I-95. They even lost contact when the Comeys stopped to visit the cemetery where their son is buried. It’s a bit eerie, to be honest. And then there’s the part where Trump wanted a copy of the agent’s notes from the first interview with Comey, so he could use them for a press conference later that day. It’s all just a bit too much, if you ask me.
The Justice Department used some interesting witnesses to build their case, including a person who knew Comey’s wife and an ex-mobster. Because, you know, when you’re trying to convince a judge to allow searches of someone’s digital footprint, you’ve got to bring out the big guns. The unnamed person who contacted Comey’s wife said that the photo was considered by some as a call to violence against Trump. But then again, this person also said they wished they had “something more” to tell the agents, so Comey and his family members would “face consequences.” It’s all just a bit fishy, if you ask me.
The FBI agents even interviewed Salvatore “Sammy the Bull” Gravano, who said that Comey must know “86” related to killing someone. But then again, two retired FBI agents who had worked against organized crime in New York said the term was not used to refer to killing someone. So, it’s all just a big mess, if you ask me.
In the end, it’s all just a big game of he-said, she-said. But one thing’s for sure – James Comey’s got some great lawyers who are fighting hard to get the case dismissed. And who can blame them? The whole thing seems like a bit of a stretch. As I finish my coffee, I’ve got to say, it’s been a wild ride reading about this story. And the best part? It’s all just getting started. Stay tuned, folks! 🚀
Armchair patriot. Believes in the free market, cold beer, and that there’s always a guy named George behind every CNN segment.
Former remote-throwing champion turned #1 couch commentator on liberal panic in the media. Born in Texas (or so his mug says), he earned a degree in Fake Newsology & Beer Philosophy from YouTube University.
