HANDMADE // CHARLOTTE, NC
ARTIFACTS FROM WORLDS
THAT PROBABLY SHOULDN'T EXIST
CREATURES · ROBOTS · DIESELPUNK · DARK FANTASY
AVAILABLE ON ETSY ENTER SHOP →

Because What The World Needed Was Another Resident Evil Movie Apparently

Because What The World Needed Was Another Resident Evil Movie Apparently

In a shocking turn of events, Sony’s latest Resident Evil movie has received widespread critical acclaim, with a staggering 96% Rotten Tomatoes score. This is a significant departure from the previous seven films in the franchise, all of which received largely negative reviews. The new film, directed by Zach Cregger, takes a more faithful approach to the original Capcom video games, focusing on a medical courier who stumbles into a T-virus outbreak in Raccoon City.

The success of this reboot is a notable exception to the usual trend of Hollywood franchises relying on familiarity rather than originality. It’s a rare instance where a studio has taken a chance on a new direction, rather than simply rehashing the same old ideas. Cregger’s approach has paid off, with critics praising the film’s more horror-oriented tone and faithful adaptation of the game’s atmosphere. It’s a welcome change from the usual mindless action and bland storytelling that has plagued the franchise in the past.

The Resident Evil Franchise: A History of Missed Opportunities

The Resident Evil franchise has been a staple of Hollywood’s horror genre for nearly two decades, with seven films released since 2002. However, despite its popularity, the franchise has consistently received poor reviews from critics. The previous films, directed by Paul W.S. Anderson, took a more action-oriented approach, focusing on a character who wasn’t even in the games. It was a misguided attempt to appeal to a broader audience, rather than staying true to the source material. The result was a series of films that were more concerned with flashy special effects and mediocre action sequences than with telling a compelling story.

🎰 HOW FAKE IS THIS NEWS?
Think you can spot the bullshit? Put this headline through SPIN THE FAKE and find out how far it spins from reality.
SPIN THE FAKE →

The new film’s success is a testament to the fact that sometimes, taking a chance on a new direction can pay off. By staying faithful to the original games and focusing on horror elements, Cregger has managed to create a film that resonates with both fans of the franchise and critics. It’s a rare instance where a studio has listened to feedback and taken a chance on something new, rather than simply relying on the same old formula.

The Future of the Franchise: More of the Same, But Better?

With the success of the reboot, it’s likely that Sony will greenlight more films in the franchise. The question is, will they continue to take a faithful approach to the source material, or will they fall back into the same old patterns of relying on action and special effects? Only time will tell, but for now, fans of the franchise can rejoice in the fact that someone has finally gotten it right. The Merchandising Department is probably already salivating at the prospect of new toys and gadgets to sell, and the Franchise Resurrection Department is likely breathing a sigh of relief that their efforts have paid off.

As the film opens in theaters this weekend, fans will finally get to see if the critical acclaim is warranted. Will the film live up to the hype, or will it succumb to the same pitfalls that have plagued the franchise in the past? One thing is certain, however: the Content Mines remain fully operational, and the Nostalgia Harvest is in full swing. Somewhere, a Focus Group has earned another bonus, and executives are nodding very seriously in an expensive meeting. It’s just another day in Hollywood, where the pursuit of profit often takes precedence over creative vision. But hey, at least the movie is good, right?

Rate this post

⚖️ ENTER THE LEGALIZER

Think the government has no idea what it's doing? Put your case before the Federal Case Terminal and find out.

ENTER THE LEGALIZER →

Leave a Reply